ESMA_QA_2370

Status: ✅ Answer Published

Link to ESMA Q&A tool: https://www.esma.europa.eu/publications-data/questions-answers/2370


Regulatory Context

Regulation : AIFMD

Level 1 Regulation: Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD) Directive 2011/61/EU

Level 2 Regulation: AIFMD - Regulation 231/2013 with regard to exemptions, general operating conditions, depositaries, leverage, transparency and supervision

Level 3 Regulation: ESMA Guidelines on funds’ names using ESG or sustainability-related terms (ESMA34-1592494965-657)

Topic: Funds’ names

Subject Matter: Guidelines on funds’ names


Question

Submission Date: 13 December 2024

When applying the exclusions referred to in paragraphs 16-18 of the guidelines, can fund managers consider the underlying project for use of proceeds instruments or should the manager always consider the whole issuer?


ESMA Answer

Answer Date: 13-12-2024

With regard to European Green Bonds that have been issued under the European Green Bonds Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2023/2631), investments in such instruments do not need to be assessed under the exclusions of investments referred to in paragraphs 16-18 of the Guidelines, because the Guidelines are intended to be read in conjunction with Level 1 legislation such as the European Green Bonds Regulation and should consider the high level of protection guaranteed by the EU legal framework for such investments.  With regard to investments in any other type of use of proceeds instruments, such as green bonds not issued under the European Green Bonds Regulation, the exclusions referred to in paragraphs 16-18 of the Guidelines should apply on a look-through basis to the economic activities financed by such instruments. The look-through approach should determine that the instrument invested in does not finance any activities referred to in Article 12(1)(a-b) and (d-g) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818. Investments in companies excluded under Article 12(1)(c) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 would not be able to benefit from this look-through approach (i.e. those companies are always excluded under the exclusions referred to in paragraphs 16-18 of the Guidelines).


This document was automatically extracted from the ESMA EMIR Q&A database.