ESMA_QA_1807
Status: ✅ Answer Published
Link to ESMA Q&A tool: https://www.esma.europa.eu/publications-data/questions-answers/1807
Regulatory Context
Regulation : MIF2
Level 1 Regulation: Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Investor Protection and Intermediaries
Level 2 Regulation: No information available
Level 3 Regulation: No information available
Topic: Reporting to clients
Subject Matter: Post-sale reporting
Question
Submission Date: 06 June 2017
When fulfilling the obligation to report on a portfolio depreciating by the 10% threshold, on what basis should a firm calculate the 10% threshold? Should a firm continue to refer to the value of the portfolio at the beginning of the reporting period or refer to the portfolio value at the previous value that triggered the reporting obligation?
ESMA Answer
Answer Date: 06-06-2017
[ESMA 35-43-349 MiFID II Q&As on Investor protection Ch. 8, question 7] Firms should continue to refer to the value of the portfolio at the beginning of the reporting period to calculate the multiples of 10%. For example, if a portfolio is valued at 100,000 at the beginning of the period, it first reports if the portfolio falls to 90,000. A second reporting requirement would occur at 80,000 and a third at 70,000 (i.e. multiples of 10% of the value at the beginning of the reporting period). If the value of the portfolio is 70 000 at the beginning of the next reporting period, a first report for that reporting period would occur at 63 000.
This document was automatically extracted from the ESMA EMIR Q&A database.